Deceit is defined this way: A stratagem; a trick. The quality of being deceitful; falseness (http://www.yourdictionary.com).
Since the early 1980’s (when I began to be clobbered with the realities of politics), I’ve noticed that politicians (and those with a political agenda) were neck-deep in deception. They would say something but that “something” was always as shrouded in lies and half-truths as the planet Jupiter is shrouded with gases. It was quite noticeable that, if there was a promise made, it simply never came to fruition. The overt machinations and melodramas how “We’re the best party because....” were there but you couldn’t see the underlying movements and underpinnings without paying close attention and knowing how to read the code or political-ese. Just about every sentence was bound in what I later learned was “double-speak”.
Then came the revelation of a very ominous reality; there were those in leadership who were without scruples and who had no particular compunction to obey any such rules and laws (including the Constitution) which would compromise their agendas (and dare I say “revolution”?). This was no small shock as I am very much a product of the (somewhat naive) 1950’s. This was “America the beautiful” and our politicians were sworn to uphold the Constitution and to watch out for our best interest and welfare, to insure the domestic tranquility, and to do that which was for the betterment of “we the people”, right? Ah, yeah. After no small amount of study and attention to detail (i.e. learning to read between the lines), it became obvious that the people of America were being deceived on a monumental level. They were hanging on to a bill of goods.
In retrospect I can see how naive was. However, I can’t help notice that far too many people today are where I was 25 years ago and need to be given a good dose of political caffeine to pry open their eyes. This is especially critical given the ratio of ignorance to the information that’s available on the internet and the fact that more than ¾ of all Americans have a computer and have internet access.
This “taking of America” (currently under the double-speak guise of “taking back America”) has come about by a steady and relentless change of all things as we know them. Certainly the largest wheel began rolling downhill under the direction of the founder of the “New Deal In Socialism”; the son of a soulless-serpent, Franklin D. Roosevelt who made us vassals of the police welfare-state. Since there are those who are much better at explaining this specific chicanery and, since there are many accounts of this available, I will defer to the reader to search them out. Let’s at least acknowledge that our society is being engineered in a particular direction and rather look at some specifics of deception.
The communists are quite adroit at this practice. Let’s look at a somewhat recent example. M. Gorbechov said this at a 1987 Politburo session: "Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." I think it would be easy to say that they believe in changing everything but what appears.
The “tools” are a smorgasbord of political theories and agendas including Marxism/socialism, dialectical materialism, humanism, the theory of evolution, atheism, Hegelian Dialectic, and a plethora of other Godless dynamics. This should hardly be a mystery to those who understand “warfare”. A good army has more than one weapon at its disposal. Likewise, if manpower and armament are available, then you assail you enemy on all sides much as a pack of wolves would do to an injured caribou.
The best way to defeat an enemy is to re-educate them (or, as we seeing now in our public schools, un-educate them) and make him defeat himself or incapable or unwilling to defend himself. Talk about deception! To have your enemy actually fight against himself by fighting for his cause is nothing less than strategic brilliance. It also employs the old “divide and conquer” tactic. Isn’t that what Lenin said? Lenin’s plan states: "First we will take Eastern Europe; then the masses of Asia; then we will encircle the United States which will be the last bastion of capitalism. We will not have to attack them, for they will fall into our hands like over-ripe fruit." There’s no mistaking what he was saying. We will defeat ourselves.
When Angela Davis, an avowed communist, was allowed by the SCOTUS to teach communism to our college kids, I knew that this country was in big trouble. I just didn’t realize how much trouble it was until later. Now, the teaching of communism/socialism is not only allowed, it’s required. A change was made but school appeared to not have changed at all because the deception was wrapped up in the cloak of “freedom of speech” and ”civil rights” and given legitimacy by black-robed traitors.
Another scary change came with the revocation of property ownership in America. Let’s take a look at the first plank of the Communist Manifesto (Karl Marx) is: “Abolition of property in land and the application of all rents of land to public purpose”. In 1988 I took a real estate course which opened my eye as wide as paper plate concerning the depth of deception being propagated by our government. When a person does not pay their property taxes on their home, it “escheats” back to the state. I asked the broker who was teaching the course, “This means that the state owns the property, doesn’t it?”. She advised that that was, in deed, the case. I commented that I thought this was the United States of America. Her reply was “Sometimes I wonder”. In essence, you pay “rent” to the government. However, it's called a tax to hide the true meaning. If you don’t pay your rent, you are thrown out of the home that you thought was yours. Pretty slick, I should say.
While we do have certain rights to the property (we can re-sell it, encumber it, leave it as an inheritance, improve it, et. al.), we do not own it. You can’t have such a thing in a socialist state because it empowers the people. We “rent” it from the government with “application of all rents of land to public purpose” exactly according to Karl Marx. No one squawks because it appears that they own the property. And, as my ex-wife’s brother-in-law stated upon hearing this truth: “As long as I still have my BBQ grill I don’t care”. It’s certainly much easier to be complacent and not have to fight city hall.
Even the Socialist Party of America uses the same deception on its own members (http://sp-usa.org/)! One justification for its existence is that, under socialism, the people are empowered. This is totally contradictory and incongruent with socialist doctrine. It cannot be since, without property rights, you are immediately without power (and real wealth, for that matter) which we see our founding fathers laboring intensively to point out in their writings. If property ownership means nothing, then why do the socialists want all of it? It is the cloak of deception casting its pall upon its victims. But, in what other way can you rid the country of the evils of being under a Constitutional Republic that was fought for, bled for, and died for by many brave and great men?
We even have deception wrapped and hidden beneath the black robes of the judiciary. The robes represent absolute truth, justice, and dignity with a presumption of common sense. That has changed as well with the unscrupulous modifiers of truth who don their robes with no compunction about the sanctity of their position. But the robes remain the same and all appears to well while covering the olid rancid doctrines of treason harbored in the hearts of men whose conscience has been seared with a hot iron.
It is high time that we continue to blow the trumpet of alarm and strip back the covers from the compromising whores in Washington DC and expose them and their bedfellows. The public needs to view them for the purveyors of perversion that they are. Remember; it’s never a problem to be ignorant. However, it surely is a shame to remain so and even more so to remain silent once the truth has been revealed.
