At EASE!!! I'll try to keep this short, 'cause I just KNOW my fellow
"homo-phobes" & other conservative Christians want to get out there &
find some other ways to harass, demean & deny "civil rights" to the
"poor downtrodden" gays.
For the benefit of those who may lack the intelligence to infer, from
the quotation marks and the
totally out-of-character statements, that this is sarcasm and
absurdity, THAT'S WHAT IT IS !!!
When I took the oath (3 X) to uphold the Constitution, I meant ALL of
it. The only problem is that
the un-elected activist-judicary insists on violating it, for "social
justice", which is (in reality)
judicial and social INJUSTICE!!!
The Constitution is very clear that "We, the PEOPLE..." have the right
to pass laws. The Judiciary, is supposed to compare our laws to the
Constitution and, if they are in accord, assist in their enforcement.
Instead, they want to "legislate from the bench" by intentionally
MIS-interpreting the Constitution, for the benefit of whatever group
is the "cause celebre", at the moment. "...promote the GENERAL
welfare..." does NOT mean re-define marriage, for the benefit
of a minority.
Just as it is unconstitutional for the activist-judiciary to say that
a certain minority gets preferential treatment with regard to college
admissions & jobs, so is it to say that thousands of years of social
custom & Biblical law must be reversed, for the benefit of the judge's
pet group.
According to a guest on a very reputable radio talk show, the judge is
a member of the gay community and should have recused himself. I'm not
sure about that, as I guess the gays could say that a "straight" Judge
should recuse him/herself.
The fact is, gay or straight, the Judge needs to follow the law, not
"compassion" . Justice is to be TEMPERED with mercy, not be replaced
by it.
If this ruling is allowed to stand, we will see our courts clogged
with cases of people who's "civil rights" are being trampled because
they are denied the right to marry anything or anyone, from their
sibling to their 37 best friends, from their car to their dog.
I wonder where the activist-judges will draw the line, or IF they
will. According to their own idio(t)logy , they can't.
Actually, as a forgiven sinner, I guess I could be saying, "Go ahead,
the more you mess things up, the sooner He'll come back." Just can't
seem to give up on the ignorant & mis-led, without a fight.
Can you imagine how the groups who are NOT favored by this cesspool
sludge decision are now salivating? Picture it!!! nambla (north
american man-boy love association [? hope I got that right]) & other
pedophiles, polygamists, bi-sexual polygamists, tri-sexual (if it's
sexual they'll try it) and multi-sexual, including beastialists
(animal LOVERS) and what I call objecti-amorists, whose tastes run the
gamut of in-animate objects and (with the trashing of the traditional
definition of marriage) will, now, finally, have a judicial(?) ally to
whom they can look for legitimacy.
All that will be necessary is a "loving relationship". Society has no
right or significant interest in preventing these poor, downtrodden,
minorities from fulfilling their domestic bliss, or does it?
If you follow the opinion that marriage is an institution, created by
God, then you pretty much have to follow His rules, but God appointed
us (U.S.) to rule over our society and society means people. We have
to respect certain social norms of behavior, in order to be accepted,
by society.
If we choose not to accept those norms, like cleanliness, manners &
laws, we may be shunned or even imprisoned.
We hire people to administer the day-to-day business of society and
they undertake (under oath or affirmation) a fiduciary responsibility,
to "We The People...", their employers. Judges (real ones, not
self-important judicial activists, with an agenda) walk a narrow line
between the tyranny of the masses & the tyranny of the minorities,
including "political correctness ".
Since our system of laws is based on the Judeo-Christian standard and
has worked pretty well, for so many years, it should not be so lightly
disregarded. The upheaval in our society, as a result of this selfish,
narcissistic movement and this agenda-driven, self-aggrandizing,
in-judicial activist will cause devastating repercussions, for
generations.
Your assignment: Contact all of your congresspersons & urge them to
petition the Supreme Court to restore the proper definition of
marriage, one man & one woman.
May God bless y'all & bless & preserve America & all of our guardians,
especially those in harm's
way. Hooahh!!!
Sgt. Mack, out. Leaving the air & closing station
