Take SEATS!!!
This may be a short class, depending upon how soon I have to leave.
Got lots of fish to fry & not a lot of time. Then, again, if I get
wound up, that other stuff may have to wait.
First off, I just heard a news story that said 60% of republicans
favor higher taxes on the rich. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU IDIOTS?!!! THAT
MAKES YOU RINOS!!! YOU NEED TO STICK YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR WINDOWS &
SHOUT, "I'M A HYPOCRITE, A THIEF AND A BUCKET OF CESSPOOL SLUDGE!!!"
FRONT-LEANING REST POSITION, DROP!!! PUSHUPS 'TIL I GET TIRED!!!
Once, again, I have been forced to defer an important subject to a
later class, because some methane-breathers have demonstrated,
unequivocally, that what they have for brains would be utilized MUCH
more effectively in contributing to the growth of roses or some other
beautiful plant, instead of contributing to the growth of ugliness,
stupidity & corruption.
I can understand the idea of 89% of democrats (liberals) wanting to
steal money from their neighbors, but I'm ashamed to be associated
with any "republican" who supports this notion.
Let's say that I made $50,000, when I was employed & paid 15% income tax & my
neighbor made $1,000,000 & paid 50%. I would have paid $7,500, in
taxes & he would have paid $500,000.
In the first place it is EVIL, to take 1/2 of what he earned,
essentially, under duress, at gunpoint.
Unless he is stealing that money, like the government and the
poly-tickians (remember, many blood-sucking vermin?) do, he has a
right to KEEP IT!!!
In the second place, it is enlightened self-interest for me to want
him to be motivated to make those bucks, because poor people don't
employ anyone.
He may be buying stuff that is made by my other neighbors & me & even,
directly, employing some of us, which contributes to the health of the
economy.
Think back to the founding of this country, when everyone was required
to give their crops to the common storehouse & everyone drew, equally,
from it.
IT DIDN'T WORK!!!
No one had any incentive to excell & the whole outfit was going to
pot. They had to divide up the land & allow the farmers to keep their
produce. Then they traded with the craftsmen & the capitalist society
came to America.
God bless it & them, as THAT is how we came to have the strongest
country in the world & the highest standard of living & the most
innovative society in history.
In more recent history, it wasn't our military that forced the Soviet
Union out of business, although we kept them at bay while it was
happening, & only the strength of our CAPITALIST SOCIETY allowed us to
do that.
It WAS, IN FACT, that same CAPITALIST SOCIETY that did the Kremlin in.
They didn't have the freedom to innovate & build strength, because the
state controlled everything & was even more corrupt than OUR
poly-tickians, strange, but true.
Remember that all power corrupts & absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
We need to get behind the flat tax or the consumption tax as the only
fair methods of raising revenue. I, personally, favor the consumption
tax. If my neighbor makes $1,000,000 & lives moderately, he should be
able to leave his money to his heirs.
If he (or they) "live large" they would pay for the privilege. A
consumption tax of 10% (as an example) would collect $3,000 on a
yearly expenditure of $30,000 &
$10,000 on $100,000.
The more you spend, the more you would pay. It would be up to you to
determine your lifestyle & how much you would be taxed.
Now we come to the
"holier-than-thou-don't-read-the-bible-I'LL-tell-you-what-god-wants-you-to-do-'cause-I'M-a-liberal-&-THEREFORE-HOLIER-than-you'll-ever-be."
"Revival" & snake oil sales pitch.
A certain Robert V. Latour, a self-described "...ordained...Christian
clergyman", lays out God's commandments for Christian charity &, then,
says he has to oppose tax cuts for the
wealthy and that he has a "..moral and Christian obligation to work to
help the less fortunate
in our society.Jesus gave all of us that obligation." To the LAST
part, I'll say,AMEN!!!
I hope that he will (personally) work for these things and give of his
own money & possessions & (if he does) I will praise him to the Father
& pray for his body & soul.
I find, however, that many who exhort others to be charitable & "give
'til it hurts" spend more time in the "counting house", tallying the
collection than they do in the "alms house" caring for those
unfortunates whose plight they so loudly proclaim.
The only thing "Rev" Latour failed to quote is the part of the Bible
in which Jesus said that the government shall relieve you of the
individual obligation & choice (of whether to support druggies & other
freeloaders) by taxing you at usurious rates so that they can create a
dependency class that is beholden to the leftists in government and
will vote for & with them.
Do you suppose that failure was an over sight? Maybe it was because it
isn't there & Jesus meant for charity to be individual and NOT
institutionally compulsory.
That would certainly comport with the divinely inspired language of
the Unanimous Declaration & Constitution, where it says that, for
these reasons, our hired administrators
shall do these things and for the reason that we are a free people,
they shall do no more.
Everything else shall be up to the states, or "...the PEOPLE" & just
as Jesus did not empower the government to extort "charity" from
"...the PEOPLE", in the bible, neither did He, in our founding
documents.
O.K., everyone who has understood & accepted the truth of these words,
CEASE PUSHUPS!!! On your FEET!!! Everyone else, CARRY ON!!! & COUNT
LOUDLY!!!
Remaining class, on your FEET!!!
Heads bowed!
Heavenly Father, you know our concerns & our frailties. We ask your
help & mercy for both.
In Jesus' Name we pray, HOOAAHHH!!!
God bless y'all & God bless America, HOOAAHHH!!!
Section Chiefs, put 'em to work!
Sgt. Mack out, leaving the air & closing station. Dis-MISSED
